Compare AU
Compare QUAL vs. CETF
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Overview
When it comes to investing in the Australian stock market, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are a popular choice. Two well-known options in the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) are the VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (QUAL) and the VanEck Ftse China A50 ETF (CETF). In this comparison, we'll delve into these ETFs across various dimensions to help you make an informed investment decision.
Community Stats
QUAL | CETF | |
---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 1,363 | 32 |
Median incremental investment | $947.04 | $993.50 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $3,248.86 | $1,351.20 |
Average age group | > 35 | 26 - 35 |
Key Summary
QUAL | CETF | |
---|---|---|
Strategy | QUAL's key objective is to invest in high-quality companies that have outperformed the market over the long term compared to global equity benchmarks. | CETF.AX was created on 2015-06-26 by VanEck. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on total market equity. The Fund seeks to provide investors with access to a portfolio of the 50 largest companies in the mainland Chinese market. |
Top 3 holdings | Meta Platforms Inc Class A (4.98 %) Microsoft Corp (4.95 %) Apple Inc (4.89 %) | Kweichow Moutai Co Ltd Class A (11.92 %) Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Class A (6.03 %) China Merchants Bank Co Ltd Class A (5.32 %) |
Top 3 industries | Information Technology (39.50 %) Communication Services (21.36 %) Health Care (16.44 %) | Financials (37.22 %) Consumer Staples (32.17 %) Industrials (12.90 %) |
Top 3 countries | United States (77.74 %) Switzerland (4.98 %) United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (4.22 %) | China (100.00 %) |
Management fee | 0.4 % | 0.6 % |
Key Summary
QUAL | CETF | |
---|---|---|
Issuer | VanEck | VanEck |
Tracking index | MSCI World ex Australia Quality Index - AUD | FTSE China A50 Index - CNY |
Asset class | ETF | ETF |
Management fee | 0.4 % | 0.6 % |
Price | $53.61 | $56.30 |
Size | $6.505 billion | $33.544 million |
10Y return | 190.25 % | N/A |
Annual distribution yield (5Y) | 1.85 % | 1.76 % |
Market | ASX | ASX |
First listed date | 31/10/2014 | 26/06/2015 |
Purchase fee | $6.50 | $6.50 |
Community Stats
QUAL | CETF | |
---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 1,363 | 32 |
Median incremental investment | $947.04 | $993.50 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $3,248.86 | $1,351.20 |
Average age group | > 35 | 26 - 35 |
Pros and Cons
QUAL | CETF | |
---|---|---|
Pros |
| |
Cons |
|
QUAL | CETF |
---|---|
Higher exposure to US market | Lower exposure to US market |
Lower management fee | Higher management fee |
Higher price growth | Lower price growth |
Higher distribution yield | Lower distribution yield |