Compare AU
Compare JRHG vs. GOOD
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Overview
When it comes to investing in the Australian stock market, shares are a popular choice. Two options in the ASX are JRHG and GOOD. In this comparison, we'll delve into these options across various dimensions to help you make an informed investment decision.
Community Stats
JRHG | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | N/A | Low |
Pearlers invested | 0 | 1 |
Median incremental investment | $0 | $643.50 |
Median investment frequency | N/A | Monthly |
Median total investment | $0 | $649.22 |
Average age group | N/A | > 35 |
Key Summary
JRHG | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
Strategy | JRHG.AX was created on 2023-11-16 by JPMorgan. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on total market equity. | GOOD.AX was created on 2023-02-07 by Janus Henderson. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on broad credit fixed income. The Fund seeks to achieve a total return before fees that exceeds the total return of the Benchmark by 0.75% p.a. over rolling 3 year periods. |
Top 3 holdings | Jpmorgan Gl Re En In Eqh Active ETF (Managed Fund) (100 %) | Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF (100 %) |
Top 3 industries | ||
Top 3 countries | ||
Management fee | 0.3 % | 0.5 % |
Key Summary
JRHG | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | JPMorgan | Janus Henderson |
Tracking index | MSCI World ex Australia - AUD - Benchmark TR Net Hedged | |
Asset class | ETF | ETF |
Management fee | 0.3 % | 0.5 % |
Price | $63.91 | $50.32 |
Size | N/A | N/A |
10Y return | N/A | N/A |
Annual dividend yield (5Y) | 0.14 % | 1.42 % |
Market | ASX | ASX |
First listed date | 15/11/2023 | 14/03/2023 |
Purchase fee | $6.50 | $6.50 |
Community Stats
JRHG | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | N/A | Low |
Pearlers invested | 0 | 1 |
Median incremental investment | $0 | $643.50 |
Median investment frequency | N/A | Monthly |
Median total investment | $0 | $649.22 |
Average age group | N/A | > 35 |
Pros and Cons
JRHG | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
Pros |
|
|
Cons |
|
|
JRHG | GOOD |
|---|---|
Lower management fee | Higher management fee |
Lower distribution yield | Higher distribution yield |