Compare AU
Compare IIGF vs. HQUS
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Industry & Region
Country Exposure
IIGF | HQUS | |
|---|---|---|
Australia | 86.90 % | |
New Zealand | 7.31 % | |
United States | 5.79 % |
Industry Exposure
Key differences
•
IIGF has a higher allocation (16.56 %) in the Consumer Discretionary sector than HQUS (9.74 %).
•
The most popular industries that IIGF is exposed to are Consumer Discretionary (16.56 %), Materials (12.83 %), and Health Care (12.50 %). Comparatively, HQUS is most exposed to Industrials (15.70 %), Financials (14.30 %), and Information Technology (13.94 %).
IIGF | HQUS | |
|---|---|---|
Consumer Discretionary | 16.56 % | 9.74 % |
Materials | 12.83 % | 5.55 % |
Health Care | 12.50 % | 12.41 % |
Energy | 11.16 % | 4.66 % |
Information Technology | 11.05 % | 13.94 % |
Other | 10.82 % | 1.01 % |
Financials | 10.43 % | 14.30 % |
Industrials | 7.80 % | 15.70 % |
Communication Services | 6.85 % | 3.47 % |
Real Estate | 5.10 % | 5.93 % |
Consumer Staples | 7.01 % | |
Utilities | 6.28 % |