Compare AU

Compare HQUS vs. IBAL

Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.

BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight Currency Hedged ETF

ASX

Buy

Buy

Overview
Industry & Region

Industry & Region


Country Exposure

HQUS

IBAL

United States

47.38 %

Australia

36.02 %

Japan

3.94 %

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

2.12 %

Canada

1.70 %

Switzerland

1.58 %

France

1.39 %

Netherlands

1.07 %

Denmark

0.91 %

New Zealand

0.89 %

Germany

0.68 %

Sweden

0.55 %

Italy

0.39 %

Spain

0.26 %

Finland

0.23 %

Hong Kong

0.21 %

Singapore

0.21 %

Brazil

0.17 %

Norway

0.10 %

Ireland

0.10 %

Belgium

0.07 %

Portugal

0.01 %

Austria

0.01 %

Israel

0.01 %


Industry Exposure

icon for key differences panel

Key differences

  • β€’

    HQUS has a higher allocation (3.56 %) in the Communication Services sector than IBAL (0.03 %).

  • β€’

    The most popular industries that HQUS is exposed to are Industrials (15.30 %), Financials (14.30 %), and Information Technology (13.53 %). Comparatively, IBAL is most exposed to Other (99.97 %), and Communication Services (0.03 %).

HQUS

IBAL

Industrials

15.30 %

Financials

14.30 %

Information Technology

13.53 %

Health Care

12.21 %

Consumer Discretionary

9.87 %

Consumer Staples

7.43 %

Utilities

6.33 %

Real Estate

6.14 %

Materials

5.42 %

Energy

4.40 %

Communication Services

3.56 %

0.03 %

Other

1.51 %

99.97 %

Home