Compare AU

Compare ETPMPT vs. RGOS

Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.

Physical Platinum

ASX

Buy

Buy

Overview
Performance

Overview

When it comes to investing in the Australian stock market, shares are a popular choice. Two options in the ASX are ETPMPT and RGOS. In this comparison, we'll delve into these options across various dimensions to help you make an informed investment decision.

Community Stats

ETPMPT

RGOS

Popularity

Low

N/A

Pearlers invested

8

0

Median incremental investment

$575.00

$0

Median investment frequency

Fortnightly

N/A

Median total investment

$3,883.70

$0

Average age group

26 - 35

N/A


Key Summary

ETPMPT

RGOS

Strategy

ETPMPT.AX was created on 2009-01-02 by ETFS. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on platinum commodities. ETFS Physical Platinum (ETPMPT.AX) is designed to offer investors a simple, cost-efficient and secure way to access physical platinum by providing a return equivalent to the movements in the platinum spot price less the applicable management fee.

RGOS.AX was created on 2024-04-12 by Russell. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on total market equity. The Fund aims to outperform the Funds benchmark, before costs and tax, over the long term by providing exposure to a diversified portfolio of predominantly international shares.

Top 3 holdings

Physical Platinum (100 %)

Russell Sust Global Opportunities Complex ETF (100 %)

Top 3 industries

Top 3 countries

Management fee

0.49 %

0 %


Key Summary

ETPMPT

RGOS

Issuer

ETFS

Russell

Tracking index

LBMA Platinum Spot Price AUD

Asset class

ETF

ETF

Management fee

0.49 %

0 %

Price

$136.27

$22.01

Size

$22.006 million

N/A

10Y return

-3.50 %

N/A

Annual dividend yield (5Y)

- %

0.85 %

Market

ASX

ASX

First listed date

30/01/2009

15/04/2024

Purchase fee

$6.50

$6.50


Community Stats

ETPMPT

RGOS

Popularity

Low

N/A

Pearlers invested

8

0

Median incremental investment

$575.00

$0

Median investment frequency

Fortnightly

N/A

Median total investment

$3,883.70

$0

Average age group

26 - 35

N/A


Pros and Cons

ETPMPT

RGOS

Pros

  • Higher price growth

  • Lower management fee

  • Higher distribution yield

Cons

  • Higher management fee

  • Lower distribution yield

  • Lower price growth

ETPMPT

RGOS

Higher management fee

Lower management fee

Higher price growth

Lower price growth

Lower distribution yield

Higher distribution yield

Home