Compare AU

Compare CFLO vs. MTUM

Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.

BetaShares Global Cash Flow Kings ETF

ASX

Buy

Buy

Overview
Industry & Region

Industry & Region


Country Exposure

CFLO

MTUM

United States

73.41 %

Japan

8.36 %

Switzerland

3.49 %

France

3.02 %

Denmark

2.92 %

Spain

2.39 %

Canada

1.51 %

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

1.44 %

Sweden

1.37 %

Israel

0.36 %

Germany

0.35 %

Netherlands

0.33 %

Italy

0.24 %

Hong Kong

0.15 %

China

0.14 %

New Zealand

0.13 %

Finland

0.12 %

Poland

0.10 %

Singapore

0.08 %

Belgium

0.04 %

Austria

0.04 %

Norway

0.01 %


Industry Exposure

icon for key differences panel

Key differences

  • β€’

    CFLO has a higher allocation (28.97 %) in the Other sector than MTUM (1.98 %).

  • β€’

    The most popular industries that CFLO is exposed to are Other (28.97 %), Information Technology (28.37 %), and Financials (11.52 %). Comparatively, MTUM is most exposed to Financials (53.50 %), Consumer Discretionary (13.39 %), and Real Estate (11.40 %).

CFLO

MTUM

Other

28.97 %

1.98 %

Information Technology

28.37 %

3.64 %

Financials

11.52 %

53.50 %

Industrials

7.52 %

3.83 %

Health Care

6.87 %

5.16 %

Communication Services

4.80 %

1.83 %

Consumer Discretionary

4.18 %

13.39 %

Consumer Staples

3.36 %

1.09 %

Energy

2.84 %

0.10 %

Real Estate

1.11 %

11.40 %

Materials

0.46 %

3.13 %

Utilities

0.95 %

Home