Compare AU

Compare CFLO vs. HQUS

Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.

BetaShares Global Cash Flow Kings ETF

ASX

Buy

Buy

Overview
Industry & Region

Industry & Region


Country Exposure

CFLO

HQUS

United States

73.41 %

Japan

8.36 %

Switzerland

3.49 %

France

3.02 %

Denmark

2.92 %

Spain

2.39 %

Canada

1.51 %

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

1.44 %

Sweden

1.37 %

Israel

0.36 %

Germany

0.35 %

Netherlands

0.33 %

Italy

0.24 %

Hong Kong

0.15 %

China

0.14 %

New Zealand

0.13 %

Finland

0.12 %

Poland

0.10 %

Singapore

0.08 %

Belgium

0.04 %

Austria

0.04 %

Norway

0.01 %


Industry Exposure

icon for key differences panel

Key differences

  • β€’

    CFLO has a higher allocation (30.37 %) in the Other sector than HQUS (1.18 %).

  • β€’

    The most popular industries that CFLO is exposed to are Other (30.37 %), Information Technology (26.44 %), and Financials (12.25 %). Comparatively, HQUS is most exposed to Industrials (15.19 %), Financials (14.34 %), and Information Technology (13.11 %).

CFLO

HQUS

Other

30.37 %

1.18 %

Information Technology

26.44 %

13.11 %

Financials

12.25 %

14.34 %

Industrials

7.43 %

15.19 %

Health Care

7.13 %

12.60 %

Communication Services

4.25 %

3.73 %

Consumer Discretionary

4.09 %

9.80 %

Consumer Staples

3.50 %

7.45 %

Energy

2.93 %

4.35 %

Real Estate

1.12 %

6.39 %

Materials

0.49 %

5.37 %

Utilities

6.49 %

Home