Back
Compare AU
Compare ACDC vs. XMET
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Overview
When it comes to investing in the Australian stock market, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are a popular choice. Two well-known options in the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) are the Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC) and the Betashares Critical Minerals ETF (XMET). In this comparison, we'll delve into these ETFs across various dimensions to help you make an informed investment decision.
Community Stats
ACDC | XMET | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 2,528 | 231 |
Median incremental investment | $800.00 | $1,005.61 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $2,031.52 | $1,633.02 |
Average age group | > 35 | > 35 |
Key Summary
ACDC | XMET | |
|---|---|---|
Strategy | The Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ASX: ACDC) seeks to track the performance of The Solactive Global Lithium Index before account fees, expenses and taxes. The index invests in companies involved in the lithium business. This includes companies involved in all aspects of lithium, from mining and refining the metal, to producing batteries and Electric Vehicles (EVs). | XMET.AX was created on 2022-10-26 by BetaShares. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on materials equity. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide an investment return that aims to track the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index, before taking into account fees and expenses |
Top 3 holdings | Panasonic Holdings Corp (3.60 %) Siemens AG (3.06 %) Hitachi Ltd (3.05 %) | KRW - KOREAN WON (0 %) PILBARA MINERALS LTD (6.24 %) BHP GROUP LTD (6.00 %) |
Top 3 industries | Materials (38.52 %) Industrials (27.84 %) Information Technology (23.72 %) | Other (54.19 %) Materials (45.78 %) Industrials (0.07 %) |
Top 3 countries | United States (22.56 %) China (14.39 %) Australia (14.25 %) | Canada (38.24 %) Australia (22.07 %) United States (16.46 %) |
Management fee | 0.69 % | 0.69 % |
Key Summary
ACDC | XMET | |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | Global X | BetaShares |
Tracking index | Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Net |
Asset class | ETF | ETF |
Management fee | 0.69 % | 0.69 % |
Price | $127.60 | $16.27 |
Size | $634.719 million | $141.017 million |
10Y return | N/A | N/A |
Annual distribution yield (5Y) | 4.90 % | 1.15 % |
Market | ASX | ASX |
First listed date | 03/09/2018 | 27/10/2022 |
Purchase fee | $6.50 | $6.50 |
Community Stats
ACDC | XMET | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 2,528 | 231 |
Median incremental investment | $800.00 | $1,005.61 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $2,031.52 | $1,633.02 |
Average age group | > 35 | > 35 |
Pros and Cons
ACDC | XMET | |
|---|---|---|
Pros |
|
|
Cons |
|
|
ACDC | XMET |
|---|---|
Lower exposure to AU market | Higher exposure to AU market |
Higher exposure to US market | Lower exposure to US market |
Higher price growth | Lower price growth |
Higher distribution yield | Lower distribution yield |