Compare AU
Compare ACDC vs. QUS
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Overview
When it comes to investing in the Australian stock market, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are a popular choice. Two well-known options in the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) are the Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC) and the Betashares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (QUS). In this comparison, we'll delve into these ETFs across various dimensions to help you make an informed investment decision.
Community Stats
ACDC | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 2,323 | 69 |
Median incremental investment | $802.32 | $1,029.54 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $1,310.55 | $4,358.30 |
Average age group | 26 - 35 | > 35 |
Key Summary
ACDC | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
Strategy | The Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ASX: ACDC) seeks to track the performance of The Solactive Global Lithium Index before account fees, expenses and taxes. The index invests in companies involved in the lithium business. This includes companies involved in all aspects of lithium, from mining and refining the metal, to producing batteries and Electric Vehicles (EVs). | QUS.AX was created on 2014-12-17 by BetaShares. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on large cap equity. QUS.AX aims to track the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (before fees and expenses). The Index provides exposure to 500 leading listed U.S. companies, with each holding in the index weighted equally. |
Top 3 holdings | Tesla Inc (5.48 %) Eos Energy Enterprises Inc Ordinary Shares Class A (4.70 %) Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd (3.81 %) | BROADCOM INC (0.28 %) PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC (0.23 %) JABIL INC (0.23 %) |
Top 3 industries | Consumer Discretionary (44.06 %) Industrials (38.02 %) Information Technology (17.92 %) | Industrials (15.79 %) Financials (14.23 %) Information Technology (13.26 %) |
Top 3 countries | Japan (23.82 %) United States (18.30 %) Korea (13.38 %) | United States (98.60 %) Switzerland (0.39 %) United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (0.39 %) |
Management fee | 0.69 % | 0.29 % |
Key Summary
ACDC | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | Global X | BetaShares |
Tracking index | Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index | S&P 500 Equal Weighted |
Asset class | ETF | ETF |
Management fee | 0.69 % | 0.29 % |
Price | $87.37 | $53.15 |
Size | $511.858 million | $747.276 million |
10Y return | N/A | 104.82 % |
Annual distribution yield (5Y) | 4.05 % | 4.99 % |
Market | ASX | ASX |
First listed date | 03/09/2018 | 19/12/2014 |
Purchase fee | $6.50 | $6.50 |
Community Stats
ACDC | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 2,323 | 69 |
Median incremental investment | $802.32 | $1,029.54 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $1,310.55 | $4,358.30 |
Average age group | 26 - 35 | > 35 |
Pros and Cons
ACDC | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
Pros |
|
|
Cons |
|
|
ACDC | QUS |
|---|---|
Higher exposure to AU market | Lower exposure to AU market |
Lower exposure to US market | Higher exposure to US market |
Higher management fee | Lower management fee |
Higher price growth | Lower price growth |
Lower distribution yield | Higher distribution yield |