Back
Compare AU
Compare ACDC vs. QOZ
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Overview
When it comes to investing in the Australian stock market, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are a popular choice. Two well-known options in the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) are the Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC) and the Betashares FTSE Rafi Australia 200 ETF (QOZ). In this comparison, we'll delve into these ETFs across various dimensions to help you make an informed investment decision.
Community Stats
ACDC | QOZ | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 2,281 | 63 |
Median incremental investment | $800.00 | $1,205.81 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $2,183.84 | $2,607.84 |
Average age group | > 35 | > 35 |
Key Summary
ACDC | QOZ | |
|---|---|---|
Strategy | The Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ASX: ACDC) seeks to track the performance of The Solactive Global Lithium Index before account fees, expenses and taxes. The index invests in companies involved in the lithium business. This includes companies involved in all aspects of lithium, from mining and refining the metal, to producing batteries and Electric Vehicles (EVs). | QOZ.AX was created on 2013-07-10 by BetaShares. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on large cap equity. The ETF currently has 861.73m in AUM and 196 holdings. The investment objective of the BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF is to provide an investment return that tracks the performance of the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index (the Index), before taking into account fees and expenses. |
Top 3 holdings | Sigma Lithium Corp (4.74 %) Liontown Resources Ltd (2.98 %) Pilbara Minerals Ltd (2.96 %) | SPI 200 FUTURES DEC25 (0 %) BHP GROUP LTD (13.53 %) COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (6.26 %) |
Top 3 industries | Materials (38.52 %) Industrials (27.84 %) Information Technology (23.72 %) | Financials (31.95 %) Materials (24.29 %) Energy (7.33 %) |
Top 3 countries | Japan (23.82 %) United States (18.30 %) Korea (13.38 %) | Australia (96.38 %) United States (1.44 %) United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1.41 %) |
Management fee | 0.69 % | 0.4 % |
Key Summary
ACDC | QOZ | |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | Global X | BetaShares |
Tracking index | Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index | FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index - AUD |
Asset class | ETF | ETF |
Management fee | 0.69 % | 0.4 % |
Price | $137.56 | $18.11 |
Size | $650.210 million | $877.098 million |
10Y return | N/A | 60.98 % |
Annual distribution yield (5Y) | 4.02 % | 5.19 % |
Market | ASX | ASX |
First listed date | 03/09/2018 | 11/07/2013 |
Purchase fee | $6.50 | $6.50 |
Community Stats
ACDC | QOZ | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 2,281 | 63 |
Median incremental investment | $800.00 | $1,205.81 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $2,183.84 | $2,607.84 |
Average age group | > 35 | > 35 |
Pros and Cons
ACDC | QOZ | |
|---|---|---|
Pros |
|
|
Cons |
|
|
ACDC | QOZ |
|---|---|
Lower exposure to AU market | Higher exposure to AU market |
Higher exposure to US market | Lower exposure to US market |
Higher management fee | Lower management fee |
Higher price growth | Lower price growth |
Lower distribution yield | Higher distribution yield |