Compare AU
Compare ACDC vs. QFN
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Overview
When it comes to investing in the Australian stock market, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are a popular choice. Two well-known options in the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) are the Global Battery Tech & Lithium Companies (ACDC) and the BetaShares Australian Financials Sector ETF (QFN). In this comparison, we'll delve into these ETFs across various dimensions to help you make an informed investment decision.
Community Stats
ACDC | QFN | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 2,319 | 23 |
Median incremental investment | $801.19 | $536.00 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $1,324.95 | $2,042.50 |
Average age group | 26 - 35 | 26 - 35 |
Key Summary
ACDC | QFN | |
|---|---|---|
Strategy | The Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ASX: ACDC) seeks to track the performance of The Solactive Global Lithium Index before account fees, expenses and taxes. The index invests in companies involved in the lithium business. This includes companies involved in all aspects of lithium, from mining and refining the metal, to producing batteries and Electric Vehicles (EVs). | QFN.AX was created on 2010-12-10 by BetaShares. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on financials equity. QFN.AX aims to track the performance of an index (before fees and expenses) comprising the largest ASX-listed companies in the financial sector, including the Big 4 banks and insurance companies but excluding Real Estate Investment Trusts. |
Top 3 holdings | Tesla Inc (5.89 %) Eos Energy Enterprises Inc Ordinary Shares Class A (4.59 %) Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd (3.67 %) | S&P/ASX200 F-REIT MAR25 (0 %) COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (31.51 %) NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD (13.99 %) |
Top 3 industries | Consumer Discretionary (51.77 %) Industrials (30.67 %) Information Technology (17.56 %) | Financials (97.33 %) Other (2.67 %) Communication Services (2.56 %) |
Top 3 countries | Japan (23.82 %) United States (18.30 %) Korea (13.38 %) | Australia (99.69 %) United States (0.31 %) |
Management fee | 0.69 % | 0.34 % |
Key Summary
ACDC | QFN | |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | Global X | BetaShares |
Tracking index | Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index | Solactive Australia Financials Ex-REITs Sector Index |
Asset class | ETF | ETF |
Management fee | 0.69 % | 0.34 % |
Price | $88.00 | $16.07 |
Size | $503.502 million | $90.085 million |
10Y return | N/A | 41.34 % |
Annual distribution yield (5Y) | 4.05 % | 5.63 % |
Market | ASX | ASX |
First listed date | 03/09/2018 | 15/12/2010 |
Purchase fee | $6.50 | $6.50 |
Community Stats
ACDC | QFN | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Medium | Low |
Pearlers invested | 2,319 | 23 |
Median incremental investment | $801.19 | $536.00 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $1,324.95 | $2,042.50 |
Average age group | 26 - 35 | 26 - 35 |
Pros and Cons
ACDC | QFN | |
|---|---|---|
Pros |
|
|
Cons |
|
|
ACDC | QFN |
|---|---|
Lower exposure to AU market | Higher exposure to AU market |
Higher exposure to US market | Lower exposure to US market |
Higher management fee | Lower management fee |
Higher price growth | Lower price growth |
Lower distribution yield | Higher distribution yield |