Home
About
Pricing
Log In

What are you looking for?

Home
Pricing
Back
Compare AU

Compare CETF vs. QSML

Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.

VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF

ASX

Buy

Buy

Overview
Industry & Region

Industry & Region

Country Exposure

CETF

QSML

China

98.90 %

Hong Kong

0.94 %

United States

0.16 %

81.37 %

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

5.11 %

Japan

2.95 %

Switzerland

1.94 %

Canada

1.79 %

Sweden

1.24 %

France

1.11 %

Israel

0.99 %

Denmark

0.85 %

Finland

0.58 %

India

0.56 %

Austria

0.46 %

Italy

0.43 %

Industry Exposure

icon for key differences panel

Key differences

  • β€’

    CETF has a higher allocation (34.11 %) in the Financials sector than QSML (8.07 %).

  • β€’

    The most popular industries that CETF is exposed to are Financials (34.11 %), Consumer Staples (28.51 %), and Other (22.20 %). Comparatively, QSML is most exposed to Industrials (45.05 %), Other (21.00 %), and Information Technology (20.17 %).

CETF

QSML

Financials

34.11 %

8.07 %

Consumer Staples

28.51 %

18.29 %

Other

22.20 %

21.00 %

Industrials

15.45 %

45.05 %

Utilities

8.47 %

Consumer Discretionary

7.23 %

7.97 %

Information Technology

6.22 %

20.17 %

Materials

5.54 %

8.36 %

Health Care

5.29 %

8.52 %

Energy

8.53 %