INVESTING STRATEGY
Is it better to invest in ETF’s or LIC’s for dividends?
Chantal Selby
12 June 2022
Follow
2 Comments
almost 2 years ago
Hi Chantal. Well, depending on which funds you choose, both can pay dividends. So it depends on what you had in mind. Do you mean a stable income stream? Or do you mean the highest yield right now? Both are different.
In general, LICs have a greater ability to pay a smoother income stream, given they operate as a ‘company’ and are able to decide their own level of dividends to pay out based on their profit, whereas ETFs are forced to pay out all income and have no control over their payouts. In Australia, you’ll find that there are some old LICs which have produced similar dividends from year to year (historical, so not guaranteed going forward). Some LICs that have been around for decades include AFI, ARG, AUI and there others (just examples not recommendations).
If your goal was to target a high yield, but don’t care about the stability of that income, then there are a handful of ETFs which have are managed with that specific goal. A simple google search of ‘high yield ETFs’ and you’ll find a few options.
To be clear, both approaches (and both vehicles) have their pros and cons, but I hope this helps begin to answer your question :)
Like
2
•
Reply4000 characters left
Post Comment
Related posts
Investing Strategy
What happens if, in 30 years when I have hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in shares, nobody wants to buy them?
Hi there! What happens if, in 30 years when I have hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in shares, nobody w...
Investing Strategy
I am seeing a fairly constant downward movement across all my shares, bar one or two. Is there anything I can be doing differently.
Hello, I am still very new to investing and only working with small amounts. I have tried to be diverse with my shares a...
Investing Strategy
Difference between VDHG and VAS?
Hi Brains Trust! What's the difference between VDHG and VAS? I understand they are setup quite differently. But to a la...