Compare AU
Compare IAF vs. EDOC
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Overview
When it comes to investing in the Australian stock market, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are a popular choice. Two well-known options in the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) are the Bloomberg Aussie Bonds (IAF) and the BetaShares Digital Health and Telemedicine ETF (EDOC). In this comparison, we'll delve into these ETFs across various dimensions to help you make an informed investment decision.
Community Stats
IAF | EDOC | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Low | Low |
Pearlers invested | 502 | 9 |
Median incremental investment | $1,130.64 | $705.01 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $2,695.58 | $471.04 |
Average age group | > 35 | > 35 |
Key Summary
IAF | EDOC | |
|---|---|---|
Strategy | IAF.AX was created on 2012-03-12 by iShares. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on investment grade fixed income. The fund aims to provide investors with the performance of the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr IndexSM, before fees and expenses. The index is designed to measure the performance of the Australian bond market and includes investment grade fixed income securities issued by the Australian Treasury, | EDOC.AX was created on 2022-03-30 by BetaShares. The fund's investment portfolio concentrates primarily on health care equity. The investment objective of the BetaShares Digital Health and Telemedicine ETF is to provide an investment return that aims to track the performance of the NASDAQ CTA Global Digital Health Index (the Index), before taking into account fees and expenses. |
Top 3 holdings | AUSTRALIA (COMMONWEALTH OF) RegS (2.60 %) AUSTRALIA (COMMONWEALTH OF) RegS (2.54 %) AUSTRALIA (COMMONWEALTH OF) RegS (2.54 %) | INSULET CORP (8.47 %) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP (8.24 %) ABBOTT LABORATORIES (7.76 %) |
Top 3 industries | Other (99.30 %) Communication Services (0.26 %) Financials (0.21 %) | Health Care (75.06 %) Other (24.70 %) Consumer Staples (14.33 %) |
Top 3 countries | United States (77.51 %) China (13.32 %) Japan (4.67 %) | |
Management fee | 0.15 % | 0.67 % |
Key Summary
IAF | EDOC | |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | iShares | BetaShares |
Tracking index | Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index - AUD | Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Health Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Net |
Asset class | ETF | ETF |
Management fee | 0.15 % | 0.67 % |
Price | $101.72 | $10.25 |
Size | $2.798 billion | $1.658 million |
10Y return | -4.44 % | N/A |
Annual distribution yield (5Y) | 1.89 % | - % |
Market | ASX | ASX |
First listed date | 14/03/2012 | 29/03/2022 |
Purchase fee | $6.50 | $6.50 |
Community Stats
IAF | EDOC | |
|---|---|---|
Popularity | Low | Low |
Pearlers invested | 502 | 9 |
Median incremental investment | $1,130.64 | $705.01 |
Median investment frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
Median total investment | $2,695.58 | $471.04 |
Average age group | > 35 | > 35 |
Pros and Cons
IAF | EDOC | |
|---|---|---|
Pros |
|
|
Cons |
|
|
IAF | EDOC |
|---|---|
Lower exposure to US market | Higher exposure to US market |
Lower management fee | Higher management fee |
Lower price growth | Higher price growth |
Higher distribution yield | Lower distribution yield |